Philadelphia- Analysis of Conflict and Unity Essay

The movie Philadelphia is mainly concentrate on one man, Andrew Beckett, against the discrimination he faces by the giant legality firm he worked for. Andrew is aided in his battle by some other man, Joe Miller. The director Jonathan Demm characterises twain work force to pee impinge and consequently unity. This is complete through the use of assorted camera techniques, through the use of conference and also through the plot line by exemplifying their similarities and differences.Following the inaugural step credit sequence of the city, we ar immediately introduced to two the main characters, Andrew Beckett and Joe Miller. two are introduced as fair playyers and it is also evident that they are arguing against severally other. This establishes a nose out of difference and confrontation. This impression is enhanced by the racial difference among the two, Joe being black and Andrew being white. At first both are shown in close ups, shown separately, however the came ra shifts to a two shot which is used to show them in the same frame, seance together. This is significant as it foreshadows their original contrast and ultimate unity. After this foeman both Andrew and Joe are shown in the elevator, behaving similarly, talking on their phones. Demm characterises both men so that even though a champion of negate and opposition is established in the film, this scene demonstrates their similarities. This is used to establish a excellent sense of unity however it is mainly used to foreshadow their eventual unanimity. end-to-end the movie their similarities as well as differences have been accentuated to establish a sense of conflict and unity. Another example of their differences is towards the end of the film, when Andrew and Joe both attend a fancy dress party with their henchmans. This is the only quantify both couples are shown together and is especially significant when they are dancing. Andrew and his partner Miguel, are shown dancing to gether very closely, however the camera then shifts to Joe and his wife. This highlights their difference in sexual orientation and again establishes an on-going sense of conflict, even though they have become quite close at this point.Another important scene which displays their similarities is in the subroutine library. Both men are on that point and the scene is used to parallel them, as a library isconnotation for learning. This similarity is used to establish unity and is further back up when Joe sit with Andrew to look over his notes. At first Joe leaves and then we physically see him torn between his someoneal opinion and justice. This again represents their conflict which is substantiated when Joe sits with Andrew however he seems to be quite tense. The camera constantly shifts between close ups of both characters and then both are shown together in an aerial shot. Andrew is seen passing a legal philosophy book to Joe who accepts it. The book represents the practice o f law and justice and that is what acts in unifying both characters, as Joe is seen as judge the case.At the commencement of the case, and throughout the whole case, the camera plays an important contribution in showing the unity between Andrew and Joe. The camera constantly reverts to a two shot of Andrew and Joe which signifies their unity, and shows that they have overcome most of their original conflict however some of it still remains. While the case is going on, there is scene in a drug store, in which Andrew is approached by a homosexual footballer who asks Joe out. Joe is furious that he has been classed in the same hold up as Andrew, being gay. This shows that there is still a sense of ongoing conflict between Andrew and Joe, as Joe still seems uncomfortable on issues concerning homosexuality.Throughout the movie the dialogue plays an important role in showing the conflict and unity between Andrew and Joe. This is especially evident through the use of many quotes from J oe, regarding homosexuality and Andrew. When Andrew originally approaches Joe to represent him in court and Joe refuses it is because that Andrew is gay and has AIDS. Andrew asks Joe if he doesnt accept the case for personal issues and Joe admits Yes, thats right. This simply shows that Joe is uncomfortable with Andrew and establishes a sense of conflict.This is again evident when he visits the doctor, mad that he might obtain AIDS. Joe then says to the doctor I weart like them I dont want this person to touch me. Joe states his obvious discomfort against gays later in the film when he is in the pub. These people make me sick but a law has been broken is what Joe says when people are insulting him in the pub. All these variant quotes show that there is obvious conflict between Andrew and Joe however the law is whatunifies them.In conclusion Demm uses many methods so that Andrew Beckett and Joe Miller are both characterised in the movie, to establish conflict and then unity. This is achieved through the use of various camera techniques and the use of various dialogues. It is also achieved through the actual storyline and the manner in which Andrew and Joe are juxtaposed to create a sense of conflict however their similarities are also highlighted to show their eventual unity.Philadelphia-www.imdb.com/ backing/tt0107818/