'Elizabeth Film Questions Essay\r'

'Elizabeth’s m was very complicated, in particular for a lady ruler. Her’s was a time when the women were regarded to be inferior to the men. Monarchy was al appearances about the King, and the queer was only regarded as the bearer of the son. Elizabeth was equal to expunge above the rest by telling them that women in like adult malener had the capabilities that men had. As a ruler, the intellectual capabilities and provide to lead are needed. Being a man or a woman is only a facade that whitethorn be given by plurality all throughout. Elizabeth’s unique sort somewhat gave me the idea that life is indeed establish on the perception of state.\r\nAll should be regarded equally, and that chances should be given to some others who have non tasted success. Furthermore, Elizabeth never showed all sign of weakness during her reign, and I believe that this is something that others should apprise to follow. Decisions in the work force are non always based on the emotions of throng, but on what is right and appropriate. I also believe that is save proper for all to live an open brainpower so that disappointments may be avoided. 9. Elizabeth decided to bring into being married to her job. What are the pros and cons of such a prime(prenominal)?\r\nCommitting entirely to a specific job is something that people should learn to take seriously. At a five-year-old age, Elizabeth decided to become married to her job as Queen of England. For this, she had to leave her personal life behind, and had to range the wel fartheste of her people above anyone else. Unlike other women, Elizabeth executed a fiery heart that was far different from other women her age. As the queen, she led her armament during the Golden Age, while the women stayed home to cater to the of necessity of the children.\r\nThe pride and honor that would come with such implement is irreplaceable with any sum of money; however, breathing out home alone is another unfair effect. Since she opted not to marry, she was left alone with no one to falsify state to in times of heartaches. She had to resolve her queries alone, and had to be vehement when she was feeling lowly. 12. If you were queen or king of your fundamental law what would you do? Do you think it’s unclouded to be a monarch or a CEO? Why or why not? If I were King, I would opt for a establishment where freedom exists.\r\nI do not loss my people to be afraid by my classic presence, nor would they be hindered from airing their sentiments to me and my governance. In addition to this, I also motive to rein a republic where love and peace exists, and where others would be happy by the simple things in life. However, I also want to put a limit on the assortment of openness that may exist between the government and the people. I deem it necessary so that the people would learn to practice an honest and simple life. Personally, I believe that both positions are quite troubleso me to accomplish in their own little ways. However, I would opt to be a CEO than be a King of a land.\r\nWork as a CEO is only isolated to the problems that may be experienced by a party, as compared to the numerous problems that may be placed on the head of the King. Each decision that is made by the CEO is geared towards the success and improvement of the company alone, but may turn the other way around when placed in the wrong enclothe of hands. Regardless of such impediments, I believe that people should learn to keep an open mind for change in order to accomplish everything in a more positive note. May it be a King or a CEO, what is important is the item that as ruler, I may be able to fulfill my duties geared towards the upheaval of life.\r\n'